Amara West project blog


Investigating life in an Egyptian town

Amara West 2014: finishing up at 2-R-65

Scarab found at 2-R-65

Anna Stevens (Amara West Project Curator, British Museum) and Tomomi Fushiya (archaeologist)

It’s been another productive week on the desert survey, spurred on by the news that the pottery we’re recovering seems to date to the early part of the 18th Dynasty – several generations before the walled town of Amara West was built. So what can we say about the archaeological context of this material?

Uncovering brick rubble of an earlier phase than the stone walls

Excavations at 2-R-65, with stone walls visible to right

This week we’ve been focussing on a second site (2-R-65) located along a large dried up Nile channel in the desert to the north of the walled town. It sits on a low rocky outcrop not far from the first of our excavation sites (2-R-18), and already on the surface it is possible to make out occasional lines of dark grey schist that are presumably the remains of walls.

Tomomi excavates through the fill at 2-R-65. Note the stone walls in the right of the trench

Uncovering brick rubble beneath the stone building phase

André Vila undertook test excavations in the corner of one of the buildings here in the 1970s, and noted that it contained open fireplaces and a plaster floor. We set out a small trench over another of the stone walls and found similar deposits. In our trench, however, it was clear that the walls were actually built over the layer containing the fireplaces. The ashy debris from the fires in turn sealed a layer of rubbish containing sherds and animal bone, below which was a trampled surface with a few scattered pieces of brick.

A scarab of Menkheperra (King Tuthmosis III) from 2-R-65

A scarab of Menkheperra (King Tuthmosis III) from 2-R-65

We didn’t find any definite trace of structures that predate the stone walls, but the stratigraphy is itself important for showing that there were at least three ‘activity horizons’ here: a surface with associated mud brick structures; the subsequent accumulation of rubbish over the surface; and the later construction of the stone walls. A far more complicated site history than the surface remains suggested! It’s tempting now to see sites 2-R-18 and 2-R-65 as part of one much bigger early 18th dynasty settlement – but far too early to speculate much further on this.

Planning the stratigraphy at the end of the excavation.

Planning the stratigraphy at the end of the excavation.

So, what’s next for the survey? Well, we know that there is another large scatter of potsherds, which Vila thought were also of New Kingdom date, along the riverbank to the east of the walled town of Amara West, and in the days ahead we will be turning our attention to opening another small trench here. This site is a good few kilometres away from 2-R-18 and 2-R-65, so can we expect it to be of a different date?

Alongside regular updates on the blog, follow the season on Twitter: @NealSpencer_BM and #AmaraWest

If you would like to leave a comment click on the title


Filed under: Amara West 2014, archaeology, hinterland, New Kingdom, objects, pottery, settlement, survey

One Response

  1. […] year we investigated two sites (2-R-18 and 2-R-65) on the southern side of the palaeochannel. Both showed very clear hallmarks of Egyptian […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: